-----------------------
-----------------------
-----------------------
-----------------------
-----------------------
-----------------------

Memorials/Survivors

-----------------------
-----------------------
-----------------------
-----------------------
-----------------------
-----------------------
-----------------------
-----------------------
-----------------------
-----------------------
-----------------------
-----------------------
-----------------------
-----------------------
-----------------------
-----------------------
-----------------------

-----------------------

-----------------------
-----------------------

"Awesome Site!"

-----------------------

"Spectacular job!"

-----------------------
"High Quality Content"
-----------------------

Canines of America's!

"Top Dog Award"

-----------------------
 

 

Other Reports

 

Please Note:

The following stories are from emails we have received or messages found on the Internet.

Clark Howard column: we recently took our healthy, active, small dog to our vet for his annual checkup and shots. he was given a PROHEART injection for guard against heartworms. within two days he was a very sick dog. return visits to the vet were made and assessments were made. we happen to view, on TV, a notice about the FDA recalling PROHEART medication. a call to our vet was made, and according to them, no notice of this recall was sent to them. we called 5 other vets in our area and each had received a notice and had pulled the PROHEART medication. several more visits to our vet for testing, medications, xrays and an overnight stay in the emergency room for monitoring, were administered. Our little dog survived. we paid approximately $2000.00 in vet bills. the vet informs us that the makers of PROHEART refuse and "good faith" compensation to help defray the cost. is there any agency, government or otherwise, we might appeal to for retribution in this case? we feel some negligence may exist, either with the makers of PROHEART or the vet. thank you.

dogma My dog would have turned 5 this month, however he had to be put down yesterday due to cancer which had spread throughout his body. We found out a couple of weeks ago that my dog had liver cancer which had spread to the other organs in his abodomen and even metasized into his lungs. The vet was very surprised that such a young dog had this cancer; we were shocked. When something happens like this, owners usually look for an explanation. Why did my otherwise healthy, well-cared for dog suddenly become full of cancer at such a young age? My 3 young children and I are all heartbroken. Could we have prevented this? My first thought was to look on the Internet for info on liver cancer in dogs. I saw that there could be an environmental link and wondered if it could be due to the mosquito spraying done in my town. Then I saw the words "liver problems" and "ProHeart6" in the same sentences. Wouldn't you know it...that was the shot my dog received just once in February 2004. We had always used Interceptor, but at his routine check-up in FEB, the Vet encouraged us to try this new shot b/c it would last for 6 months and save us trouble and money. Sure, we said, what ever is best for our dog. Now, I put it out there to others...is ProHeart killing our dogs??

Posted by: Amy | December 11, 2004 07:15 PM

_________________

My 7 year old beautiful golden recieved the proheart6 shot on Oct. 30, 2003 and she died of lung cancer on Dec. 18, 2004. Coincidence? I dont think so. Last year I questioned my vet about this having a link to the proheart6 and he said no. I still felt there was a link. She was the best dog in the world and a very healthy dog....Dont use it. Please

Posted by: Cecilia Pikaard | September 27, 2004 05:16 AM

___________________________

Email 9/04 -- "Tonight we buried Gryffin's ashes in the back yard. My husband and I along with our two children shared happy memories of Gryf and sprinkled some of his ashes along our side fence. We live in the historic district of a resort town so we have alot of foot traffic by our yard. Gryffin loved to run along that fence barking and scaring the tourists".~~~~~~~~ "A little over a week ago, we lost our 20 month old Great Dane Gryffin. There was no warning, he'd been fine that morning, then after hearing him yowl in pain, I found him dying on my son's bed. This was extremely tramatic for my children and we are all heart broken"

________________

Email 9/04 --".To whom it may concern,
I would like to tell you that up until yesterday my pet's, Sabel,death was a mystery. She passed away in my arms howling in pain on 6/27/03. We had no clue what was wrong with her. She received Proheart 6 on 8/19/02. Apprx 1 month after receiving the injection she developed vomiting and diarrhea with blood. Our vet said he had no clue after running many tests. So he sent us to a specialty vet. He did a bone marrow biopsy to rule out luekemia. She also received 2 units of blood because her hemoglobin and platelets were so low. (5.3 and 35) We gave her epogen shots and several other medications. She seemed like she was getting better until she started bleeding through her nose. (It was everywhere including stains on my mattress where she once slept in peace) No one could tell us what was wrong. She suffered so long because we thought we could fight whatever it was. She was like our child. My fiance and I do not not have children so Sabel was given everything. My heart was broken when she died and it was especially hard because she was only 5 and there was no explanation. Until now. I am upset that something like that could be on the market for that long. We finally decided to get a new pup. My new vet just a couple months ago offered the Proheart 6 injection to me. I said no because my new pup would eat anything. We need to do something. Melissa"

Check out message at Hounds Group

From: “GG
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 11:43 PM
One thing to avoid is the new ProHeart 6 heartworm injection.
It has caused deaths, slow & painful ones—awful.
A group is working towards having this taken off the market
& is trying for a class action suit against Fort Dodge,
the manufacutuer. Also, collie breeds are very sensitive any
heartworm medications that contain Invermectin, so they can’t take this at all.

Unfortunately, it is about vets & pharmaceutical companies making lots of money. We’ve all been taught to think that constantly vaccinating our animals is something we need to do as good caregivers & vets can be very forceful & maniplulating into making us believe we need to do this

Berner Digests

ProHeart -- this Vet's perspective

"Susan Wilkinson"
Fri, 2 May 2003 02:23:54 -0400

ProHeart6 was released in Canada last year. It was released in the USA in 2001, and in Australia in 1999 (I think) -- so it does have a history of many many thousands of doses being administered. For those that don't know, ProHeart6 is a 6 month injectible heartworm preventative. The effective ingredient, moxidexin is micro-encapsulated and designed for slow release over the 6 month period. It must be carefully reconstituted, stored, and administered. Both clinics that I work at have used it, and I myself have administered many doses. Before using it, as with all new products out, I attended a seminar, read the literature, researched on-line with colleagues, and discussed it with my peers. I tend to be on the sceptical side, and firmly believe in "if it ain't broke, don't fix it". All medications have the potential for side effects -- as with most everything, you have to weigh the benefits against the risk. Of the greater than 1000 doses that were administered at "my" 2 clinics, there was one adverse reaction. Maybe we've been lucky ..... As ProHeart was the only thing administered to the dog that day, I know that ProHeart was the culprit. Patient was a middle aged Shih Tzu, we heartworm tested negative, and I administered the injection according to label directions. Approximately 30 minutes after returning home, the dog became anxious and developed some subtle facial swelling. The owners returned to the clinic, where I administered some antihistamines and a dose of steroids. Within 20 minutes, the dog was back to normal. We won't use ProHeart again with this particular dog! I called the company and talked to the veterinarian there -- mine was the 3rd such reaction they had had reported in Canada -- all were relatively mild, all dogs recovered uneventfully.

ProHeart is not the first heartworm preventative we recommend, but it is mentioned to owners as an option. What is great about an injectible is we can remove the client compliance issue from the mix -- I know there were no missed doses, no pill spit up in the corner later, and no product applied incorrectly. I live in a fairly rural area with a high incidence of heartworm (highest in Canada). One clinic has a high percentage of (really wonderful, caring) retirees. The retirees often opt for ProHeart as they have trouble remembering the monthly preventative. ProHeart has been a real boon to the farm dogs -- busy farmers barely have time to remember to eat, let alone remember to toss a hearworm preventative at the dog or apply Revolution -- they LOVE the convenience and knowing that their dog is protected. Geez, I have a hard enough time remembering to give it on time for my own crew, and I work with it everyday! I love not hearing "oh, I've still got 4 doses left over from last year". I actually had a client last week who has not heartworm tested their dog since 1998 -- when I told them as per clinic policy, I could not prescribe a preventative without the test, they replied "that's fine, I've got enough left over to last a couple of years" -- ARG! How well protected is this dog??

My heart goes out to the boxer and his family. I truly hope this is a case of urban legend and that no dog is going through this. I just wanted to contribute my 2 cents to hopefully forestall the knee jerk reaction we all have when hearing stories like this.

sue(Aeryn with Devyn & Rowyn)

RE: Is this true?

Rose Tierney
Fri, 02 May 2003 10:29:44 -0400

Hi,
Sometimes it pays to be stuck in your ways! I refuse to use new preventative products or vaccines until they have been in general use for at least two years. I use established protocols for heartworm prevention and will treat for fleas as and when I have a problem with them. Some products are a cure all for a lot of things but I can't see the point of using a drug that treats ear mites and sarcoptic mange and fleas etc when I don't have those problems with my dogs. My dogs are not paid to be guinea pigs!

Rose T.

Re: Proheart 6

Tracey
Sat, 3 May 2003 08:02:21 -0700 (PDT)


Sue & Andrea, thanks for your emails on Proheart, from a vet's perspective. I tend to NOT beleive things posted on the internet, you never know their true reason for posting -- for all we know that site was posted by a Proheart competitor -- or just someone that has an agenda, as we all know, Proheart does NOT do anything for fleas, ticks, or mosquitoes. Not only that, I followed the link that claimed the USDA had a warning on Proheart, and could not find it. Maybe I didn't look hard enough, or maybe the owner of the website just hoped people would believe him/her?

As you said, anyone can have a reaction to any sort of shot. I personally use Proheart 6 -- I love it, my dogs have not had reactions. I am one that is ALWAYS forgetting to give monthly pills and as I live in the midwest I know it is very important to keep my beloved pets protected against heartworms. (Oh yeah, the heartworm poster in my vet's office, with all the counties in Illinois, and all the occurances of heartworm, has a BERNER on it!! Funny, on girl at the counter didn't know what Beau was, and the poster was right in her face!! hahaha)

People also reacted this way with human vaccinations (some get/got sick, some died) ... there's always going to be people that react -- but in the long run, what do we have?? No small pox, no rubella, no measles, no polio ... with our pets we don't have as common of occurances of parvo and distemper. What is the occurance of pets reacting to parvo shots?? The trade of is worth it, as I'm sure Sue and Andrea can attest to .. a dog afflicted with parvo is horrible, just as a dog afflicted with heartworms is horrible. Not a way to die, not a way to live, treatments are costly and very hard on the pets. (I recently saw 2 puppies with parvo at the emergency clinic when I had to take Beau with pnemonia ... it was NOT pretty). I feel better knowing my babies are protected against everything, taking as much of the human error factor out. (and boy do I have lots of the error factor!!)

I'm just glad my 2 haven't ever reacted to proheart ... I'll keep up with it, and will do what I always do after any injection, watch them closely for reactions, and be prepared if they do.

Thanks,
Tracey & Beau and Kjersti

I-Dog

Mike Sprunger LaGrange Police Dept. (Unregistered Guest)
Saturday, April 10, 2004 - 12:16 pm:

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It has been my dream to be a K-9 Handler for the ten years I've been in Law Enforcement. My dream finally came true this year. I got my beautiful partner in March 2004. He was full of life, a real handful, and everything that I dreamed of as a partner, at least for the first week of K-9 training. On Monday of week two, I took him to the Vet for a routine check-up, per my contract with the school. He was given a clean bill of health by the Vet. He said he was very healthy and looked like a great partner. He gave him the Proheart6 shot the same day. Two days later, my partner quit eating, lays around and just doesn't have the energy to even hold his head up, let alone going to work and protecting me. This has gone on for two weeks now, and about 10 trips to the Vet. Two different Vets deny that the shot has anything to do with how my partner is now acting. They said that it is "just a coincidence" that he got sick after getting the shot! He gets slower and slower each day. Maci is my partner and it is absolutely killing me to see MY PARTNER run down and sick the way he is after seeing how excited he was to go to work prior to the shot!! He was absolutely, 100% healthy and energetic before he got the Proheart6 shot and now he can barely hold his head up
.


June '04 (RE: TV News) The last sentence in the tv spot noted steady increase in use of the product by vets. The reason vets are being economically force to use injectable heart worm medication is because people can buy other non injectable heartworm product over the internet now. OZ has made the oral and topical hw macrolid products over the counter and it is expected the FDA will also do so soon in the USA. Vets soon will have no drug or no annual vaccines to force clients to return for well visits unless they switch to injectable heart worm medication.
dvm from Oz
Advisory Please do not believe what the company tells you. It is all a lie so that they can make sales.
I am Sandy's friend Linda living in Singapore.
One year ago February I took my beautiful red MSH female and my black/tan dachshund to the vet here. He suggested the same thing, proheart.
My female, Roxie, the beautiful red within 3 minutes started foaming at the mouth, started seizures and then went into cardiac arrest.
Sam (Sandy) I am sure recall my reaction to that. Praise God I was still standing in front of the vet. Dr. Lye nearly had a cardiac arrest himself. Dr. Lye called the pharma company and they told him they have never had a bad report on the proheart. The same week a couple took their 2 year old golden retriever to see Dr. Lye and requested the proheart. After informing them of what happened to my Roxie they still wanted it, thinking I had a small dog. Their retriever died within ten minutes. Dr. Lye flew to the pharma company to meet with them and was told that he was the only one having problems (do I believe that one???? NO).

Sorry my friend, I took over your email. But, I still get the shakes when I think of how close we came to losing our little girl.

Linda

Dogmania Posted: Sat May 10, 2003 4:25 am

Hi,

This story is about River. His nightmare begins in july of 2002. when he recieved the proheart 6 shot. Within a few days we noticed sores appearing in his mouth & on his tongue. some the size of a quarter. We took him to the vet where he did some blood test. liver enzymes were elevated and blood counts weren't quite right. so he referred us to the university of madison wisconsin teaching hospital. they did more test and decided he was having an allergice reaction to something but would not commit to it being the proheart shot. This is the only shot River had in over a year.. He was very healthy.
They started him on an antibiotic and prednizone. over the next several months. his neck started to swell, they had to do surgery to remove a saliva gland, after he was starting to improve, he had to have some teeth remove and his fang in front broke in half. at times he seemed to stare into space and we could not get his attention until he just came out of it himself. he just wasnt him self. his immune system was getting weaker and weaker the prednizone made him gain so much weight he was now 160 lbs.

it is about six or seven months later, they are taking him off prednizone, he now has sores on both back legs that have eaten a hole to the bone and are oozing, we put hot towels soaked in epson salts to give him some relief, nothing seems to be working they thought the surgery would clear up the sores in his mouth, but they all came back, we were seeing him die right before our eyes and we couldn't stop it.
one night i was massaging his legs and notice three lumps on the size of a golf ball, it seems they just appeared over nite. he also started drooling blood, we knew we had to let him go so on April 24th 2003 we made the decision to send River to his final home where there would be no more pain. When i think back it makes me ill to think we may have caused him to suffer longer than we should because we didn't want to lose him.

River was 4 weeks old when we adopted him he was a malmute/wolf mix.
he was loving loyal, loved to go camping, swimming, ride on the golf cart, ride with the neighbor on his 4 wheeler. he was a very active dog until that july in 2002. He is very much missed by us his family and everyone who knew him.
It is in Rivers memory that i feel this story had to be told and our hearts go out to all you who lost or have an ill pet because of this shot.
I wish we would have done our homework on this before we gave it to River. he was 5 years old when he finally went home.

Please do not use this shot....

Dogmania Posted: Sat Apr 10, 2004 4:29 pm Post

I just lost my oldest baby Cutter. Her systems are exactly as described from Proheart. There is quite a bit of info out there. Another site is http://concernedvet.netfirms.com

Cutter's reaction was about 3 months after her shot. She began acting like she had a cold and went completely down in about 3 week and we had to put her down after the autoimmune amenia began and she had complete kidney failure.

I'm telling everyone I know with any dog not to get the proheart.

Dogmania Posted: Fri Jul 09, 2004 1:57 pm


I was both distraught and relieved to see a news item last night about the heartworm prevention shot being responsible for dog deaths. We had a rescued coonhound mix named Hoover for about 4 years, and he was a pretty healthy dog, although he took phenobarbitol daily for seizures ever since we got him. Our vet would monitor his kidney function and whatever else they check when a dog is on drugs We always feed super premium dog food, spare no expense when it comes to our dogs' care. We moved to a rural area and switched to a closer vet. On our first visit, he suggested the 6 month shot instead of monthly tablets. Said it was just as safe, less hassle. We agreed to it, and Hoover died exactly two weeks later, of supposed liver failure. He was a little lethargic after the shot, but after about 10 days, it was clear that something was wrong. He was just lying around and I observed him vomiting. We made an appointment immediately with our "new" vet, loaded him up, and by the time we got to the vet, he had to be lifted from the vehicle, and refused to stand. X-rays showed an enormous mass that appeared to be attached to his liver, and he was bleeding internally. They referred us to a hospital about 20 miles away for an ultrasound, and by the time we got there, he had to be carried in. While they were prepping him, he arrested. That was over a year ago, and I'm crying as I type this. At the time, we quizzed our vet about the connection between the shot and his death, and they said they had never heard of any problem or deaths due to the shot. We never had a good feeling about that vet after that, and switched back to our old vet despite the drive. After seeing the news story, I am convinced that the shot was responsible for Hoover's demise. Fortunately, our other two dogs seemed to have no reaction, and one of them had been heartworm positive when we rescued him, so I would have expected that he might be the more fragile one. I went to the manufacturers site for Proheart6 and will be filing a complaint with them. I doubt it will do much of anything, probably not even make me feel better. Makes you feel guilty when your actions are responsible for your sweet and trusting pet's death, regardless of your intentions.

AOL Message Board - MsgId: 164795:162037 - 11/13/2004 Maggie here! I didn't mean to offend any of you Californians but you do have a rep of being "a little off the wall". As for your wonderful weather almost year round, we have beautiful weather here in San Antonio too, as they say, "Don't like it, hang around a while and it will change". Cost of living and the possibility of dropping off into the ocean with the BIG quake keep my fanny here on solid ground. Remember, PJ and I are big fans of Revolution. You need to use whatever you are comfortable with. The only heartworm I'm unhappy with is that Proheart 6, the 6 month injection. I had used it on Abner, a Shih Tzu, twice. The day after he got his last shot he was at the vets with renal failure. Turns out the injections have been discontinued due to the fact of them causing renal failure. In most cases this was almost emedate after the injection, Abner was in distress the evening of the same day. Needless to say, Abner came home in an urn, there was nothing to save him. It just kills me to think that if I had picked another method Abner might still be here, he was only 4 yrs. old. The vet couldn't understand at the time why his renal system was shutting down. I didn't know of the problem with the injections until last week when PJ was due for his check-up. I asked the vet about the Proheart and he dropped a bomb on me. I was so sorry for Abner and felt so guilty, I felt his passing was all my fault. For those who have used the injections, be alert, watch for problems, everyone else, please pass the info on.
Maggie & PJ

dogmania Proheart 6 Reaction Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2003

I took my Great Dane to the vet last weekend for a checkup and to get vaccinations. The dog was 7 years old and in EXCELLENT health. The vet even commented that he was in better shape than dogs half his age.
He received a CV Booster, a Bordetella booster and a ProHeart injection. That was on Saturday.He was taken to be boarded on Sunday as we were going out of town. The kennel has been keeping him since he was a pup. He was fine on Sunday, but on Monday he was lethargic and had diarea and vomitting. He was given diarea medicine from the kennel.
He was worse on Tuesday morning and they took the dog to the vet that did the vaccinations. They put him on IV for fluids and by the end of Tuesday they said that he was doing better and called the kennel to come too get the dog. The kennel was not comfortable picking up the dog that soon as he still had a line in for fluids. He was kept overnight at the vet.
When the vet arrived the next morning, he was DEAD! Looking at the threads in this forum, it appears to be a symptom of the heartworm shots.
When the vet did a necropsy, they said he had massive infection and some blood in the abdomin. This is stange since the temp was taken at the vet on Sat, at the kennel on Monday and several times at the vet on Tuesday and he was never running a temp.
I don't know how a perfectly healthy dog that has never missed a heartwork treatment and never had any medical problems could die within 3 days of a full examination.
Anyone with information on what we can do to keep this from happening to any other beloved pets, please comment.
It is obvious the vets are not going to tell us anything that would interupt their revenue stream.
A comment about the kennel. It is extreamly clean and love their guests as much as the owners. They were devistated and as far as I am concerned did the right thing for our dog when he needed it.
Regards,
JT

 

dogma My black lab. was given a proheart6 shot in june 2004. Her name is Poco she will be 11 Jan. 26 2005. I always had her up to date on all her shot. She is very special to me and love her. And now I have to worry for her life now. And I'am very mad. We should'nt have to worred for takeing care of our loved dog.
I have had to take her to the Vet. 4 time from Blood in the urine to low enzyme in the digestive system and so on.
So I feel that something need to be done, so they can't do this to our dog we love so much. A class action Suit anainst the com. would be a good start. carolneville69@hotmail.com

Posted by: Carol Neville | October 19, 2004 04:27 PM

__________________________

My Vet seemed to be pushing this drug very aggressivly when it first come out.

It seemed like a great idea, every six months
seemd alot easier. Now the recall. I called my vet wanting a refund. They said the drug has done its job!!! Yah what kind of job??

I feel like my dog has been put in grave danger and this company who makes big money off of us trusting pet owners should reimburse anyone who has used this drug!!!

HOW CAN WE GET A PETITION GOING FOR THIS?

Posted by: Larry | September 27, 2004 08:28 AM

______________________

My maltese was injected with proheart 6 in June. In July she collapsed. We got her to the vet and he thought she was just hypoglycemic. By nightfall she was shaking all over and not eating. I was giving her karo syrup for the low sugar. I decided to take her to the emergency hospital. $1500 later my dog was diagnosed with addisons disease. Not to worry we can take care of that, all she needs is a monthly shot. In august we got her monthly shot of florinef. Two days later bright red blood started pooring out of her rectum. My husband and I rushed her again to the hospital. Today she is home, eating and having a good day. The vet said this is not related to proheart 6. We have always given her heartworm medication. She is our child and we plan for her to get the best of care. If anyone has information I would be interested in knowing. Prior to this summer she has been healthy. She is eight years old.

Posted by: joy | September 23, 2004 07:45 PM

______________________

I am appalled that this recall has happened and no one new any dangers of this drug. My dog received his third shot 3 days before the recall and now I have years of worry ahead of me. I am disabled and my little dog means more to me than I can verbalize. I talked to my vet and called several others and none claimed to know anything about the problems with the drug. My vet stated that he will do blood work re: liver and other long term problems and I should be reimbursed but that is nothing compared to the worry I will endure. Drug companies are the scum of the earth in my mind. I have Multiple Sclerosis and my doctor was pumping me full of a drug that is now involved in a class action suit regarding it's use for my situation. Who can we trust anymore? No one that is who. Money is the bottom line, nothing else matters to these people. I will NEVER trust anything that any doctor tells me again, medical or veterinarian. Thank you for letting me vent. I am scared to death for my little dog who never hurt anyone and has been a great sourse of company and love for me. God forgive them, I don't know if I can.
karenfuncannon@yahoo.com

Posted by: Karen Funcannon | September 8, 2004 09:31 AM

___________________

Dogomania was the one who got to break the news to my vet today (as I was hoping). He was sure I was misunderstanding something.

We may not have to wonder too long about how many dogs were affected. One very upset owner showed up at the clinic today after seeing/hearing about the ProHeart recall. Apparently, this dog recently died after having some similar symptoms as reported (wherever he saw it) from PH6. This guy is scheduled to meet with the vet tomorrow. Since the vet didn't even know there was a recall before I told him, I have no clue how much he's tried to find out and I can't imagine what he's going to say to this owner. I'm sure this owner is only the first of many more to come forward.

Still, the vet is sure that PH6 isn't the problem. He said the dog was having problems (seizures maybe?) prior to the shot. I'm thinking maybe a dog with problems especially shouldn't have had the shot, but the reps push it so strongly and dismiss complaints as being unfounded.

The vet's wife and one tech were outraged and called the whole thing stupid since "we" have never had a problem (how do they know?).

I love my vet, but sometimes I believe he relies too heavily on what the reps tell him. He kind of dismissed my complaint of Advantix causing a rash on not one, but TWO of my dogs since the rep told him she'd never heard of a complaint. I wish he didn't trust these reps implicitly. He's so cynical about everything else.

My best friend's dog died about 12 hours after receiving a PH6 shot over a year ago. At the time, we never even realized PH6 could have been the cause since the vet thought the dog had been poisoned. I'm sure now the dog WAS poisoned, but PH6 was the poison.

dogmania

Hi,

This story is about River. His nightmare begins in july of 2002. when he recieved the proheart 6 shot. Within a few days we noticed sores appearing in his mouth & on his tongue. some the size of a quarter. We took him to the vet where he did some blood test. liver enzymes were elevated and blood counts weren't quite right. so he referred us to the university of madison wisconsin teaching hospital. they did more test and decided he was having an allergice reaction to something but would not commit to it being the proheart shot. This is the only shot River had in over a year.. He was very healthy.
They started him on an antibiotic and prednizone. over the next several months. his neck started to swell, they had to do surgery to remove a saliva gland, after he was starting to improve, he had to have some teeth remove and his fang in front broke in half. at times he seemed to stare into space and we could not get his attention until he just came out of it himself. he just wasnt him self. his immune system was getting weaker and weaker the prednizone made him gain so much weight he was now 160 lbs.

it is about six or seven months later, they are taking him off prednizone, he now has sores on both back legs that have eaten a hole to the bone and are oozing, we put hot towels soaked in epson salts to give him some relief, nothing seems to be working they thought the surgery would clear up the sores in his mouth, but they all came back, we were seeing him die right before our eyes and we couldn't stop it.
one night i was massaging his legs and notice three lumps on the size of a golf ball, it seems they just appeared over nite. he also started drooling blood, we knew we had to let him go so on April 24th 2003 we made the decision to send River to his final home where there would be no more pain. When i think back it makes me ill to think we may have caused him to suffer longer than we should because we didn't want to lose him.

River was 4 weeks old when we adopted him he was a malmute/wolf mix.
he was loving loyal, loved to go camping, swimming, ride on the golf cart, ride with the neighbor on his 4 wheeler. he was a very active dog until that july in 2002. He is very much missed by us his family and everyone who knew him.
It is in Rivers memory that i feel this story had to be told and our hearts go out to all you who lost or have an ill pet because of this shot.
I wish we would have done our homework on this before we gave it to River. he was 5 years old when he finally went home.

Please do not use this shot....

 

Berner Digests

RE: Proheart 6 -- assessing risk generally and specifically

"Nancy Melone"
Sat, 3 May 2003 00:33:06 -0700

The link http://www.proheart6.com/release.htm may be of use to those who do use Proheart. The following link to the FDA Adverse Drug Reaction reports may also be of use http://www.fda.gov/cvm/index/ade/adetoc.htm to those who wish to investigate other drugs.

My dogs are NOT on Proheart6 - so I am not speaking from experience with this drug. Rather I am speaking from the perspective of someone who likes to analyze the meaning of data (and the implications of their absence). This emotional case description regarding an adverse reaction allegedly to Proheart provides the perfect opportunity to talk about the risks of making decisions based on a single, vivid case.

Virtually ALL DRUGS have EFFECTS/SIDE EFFECTS (in part, that is why we use them). When calibrating the risks and the benefits of any treatment protocol we need to remember this. We often forget that there are also risks in NOT using drugs. My understanding is that the 6-month injection delivery system in Proheart6 (moxidectin) was developed to improve owner compliance because: (1) many, many dog owners forget to administer the monthly heartworm tablets, thereby putting their dogs at risk and (2) heartworm is endemic in many regions of this country. According to the FDA report, it is found in all 50 states with rates of infection ranging from 5% to 45%. Again, I am not advocating Proheart6, but rather commenting on an aspect of risk assessment that may have been forgotten. Based on a very cursory reading of some of the reported adverse reactions on animals taking this drug (oral and subcutaneous (injectible) versions), in several cases these reactions could be attributed to drug overdose. Again, the exact details of this drug are less important to me than the general principle of how we look at assessing risk in making these and similar decisions for our pets.

To intelligently discuss Proheart6 (or any of the drugs that allegedly protect against heartworm), we need to know the rate of adverse reactions for the alternative drugs designed to prevent heartworm infestation -- including the older tablet formulations that many of us currently use. We also need to assess the risk of DOING NOTHING (no drugs). According to the incident report given in the Proheart link above, adverse events (note, these are not necessarily deaths) reported for Proheart6 represent 0.030% of total doses sold to veterinarians [Yes, "sold" is not the number that we would really like to know - we really want the number of doses that were "administered" - but as a researcher I can tell you that the second number is a much harder number to capture and capture accurately].

I am not an FDA researcher (far from it), but 3 adverse reactions (not necessarily deaths) out of 10,000 would constitute a "statistical rare event" in the fields with which I am familiar. Statistically rare but emotionally vivid events often cause human beings to fall victim to well-documented decision making/judgment errors. These errors revolve around how humans interpret the significance of a vivid but statistically rare event. [NOTE: Statistically rare but vivid events are events that have an extremely low probability of happening, but they may be pretty scary if they do.] Basically, the problem is that humans often over-emphasize rare events in ways that would lead them to ignore benefits and inflate probability and risk. Panic-infused reports on the Internet of a single vivid case may exacerbate the problem even more. My point here is that we do not want to fall into the trap of overreacting to what is on the face of it a low probability event. Again, I am not advocating the use of this drug, but I am advocating using reasonable decision making processes in the interpretation of data and making decisions.

Deciding to use or not to use a drug is a very complex decision -- NOT something that some stranger on the Internet can or should decide for you. Typically, more is known about side effects of older drugs than newer ones (although after some period of drug use, that difference is insignificant). Furthermore, each pet owner has a different risk preference structure (i.e., a different comfort level in their ability to tolerate risk of an adverse reaction). Similarly, one person's dogs may face very different disease risks than another person's -- depending upon several factors -- e.g., the geographic region in which they live, whether they live in rural or more highly-populated areas and so on. One also needs to take the health status of the individual dog and the habits/dependability of the dog owner into consideration. The bottom line is that the protocol that you use for preventing heartworm in your dog may not be the same one that I decide to use for mine. Both of our decisions may be perfectly logical and appropriate given our individual circumstances. Before we jump to conclusions about this drug (or any therapeutic treatment), we need to appropriately assess ALL the risks and benefits of use and non-use within the contexts that we and our dogs operate.

I am neither an advocate nor a nay sayer on Proheart6. As someone who knows her way around analyzing data and assessing risk, it is my belief that pet owners need to be informed consumers, not knee-jerk decision makers who base their actions on a single, albeit vivid adverse incident that may have causal explanations other than the drug at hand. Proving causality (i.e., this drug caused that reaction) is much more difficult than these vivid stories imply. In research, we use various forms of experimental designs to help us establish causal linkages and even then, it is very hard work. What we dream in our experimental-design heads can often not be achieved in our data-based reality -- so we are left with weaker forms of causal proof.

Like it or not, life demands that we constantly analyze our risks/returns -- we do it (knowingly or unknowingly) with every decision we make -- whenever we drive a car, walk down a dark stairway, take a plane, jog in the park, take an aspirin, kiss a baby, chew on a pencil --- yes, and even when we eat that double-dip ice cream sundae with whipping cream and extra nuts on top instead of working out on the treadmill!

Nancy Melone, Ph.D.
Mars, PA

proHeart 6 - injection

"Mark Mohapp"
Sat, 3 May 2003 09:49:25 -0500

I was very sorry to here the posting about the dog having a reaction to this. My brother is a veterinarian who refuses to use the injection on his own dogs! His philosophy is - if their is a bad reaction - how do you get the stuff out of the dog since it is made to lodge in fat cells for slow release.

My own thoughts include it is too new of a product, why put poison in a dog that takes months to evacuate, and how hard is it to give dogs a pill once a month. There are some people who recommend having a blood test done every 6 months for heart worm as opposed to dosing a dog at all. The theory being if you test twice a year IF something shows up it is still treatable. (I personally don't know enough to decide if this is safe but it is a thought)


Mark Mohapp
mmohapp@wi.rr.com

Old English Sheepdog board

My 18 month old OES went into shock about 10 minutes after receiving her DHLPP, Corona, Rabies and ProHeart on June 22, 2004. They took blood for a heartworm test prior to the inoculations which came back negative. I chose to have them done at a weekly shot clinic held at a nationwide chain because the cost was about half of what my regular vet charges for the same shots. I had recently had a full check-up with my regular vet during a visit for an ear infection and she had checked out fine. I felt it was safe to go to the clinic and at the same time prudent to pay half the price. Luckily, the receptionist was slow at check out as I was still in the building when she went down. Otherwise, she could have died in my car on the ride home.

The first indication that something was terribly wrong was when I heard someone snicker in the waiting room. I looked down at my feet and discovered I was standing in a huge puddle of urine and my pup was sitting in it. Convincing her to move seemed difficult. I thought I was imagining this. Embarrassed, I quickly began cleaning up the puddle with the roll of paper towels the receptionist provided. As I finished up I noticed a single fresh poop on the floor next to my pup who was then laid out cold. No one in the packed waiting room said anything to me. My pup lay on her side, tongue hanging out, next to her feces while I cleaned up the urine puddle. My only hope is that she went down moments before I noticed and those watching were too engrossed with my inept cleaning abilities. I stand by my belief in the supremacy of dog over human and I will never understand human beings. As soon as I noticed the poop I knew their was a serious problem and I began screaming "My dog is in shock. My dog is in shock. Get someone out here now!!!" Finally, in what seemed like an eternity, three vet techs ran out, scooped her up, and ran back to their surgery. There, they shaved nearly half of her front leg for the saline I.V., gave her steroids and a Benydryl type product and then installed a catheter. I intensely watched the faces of the techs and vet through the window in the surgery door as I could not see my pup. Thank God they knew what to do and when to do it. I am grateful for their skills in this area. She slowly came out of the shock. I was numb at this point. Once my baby was safe at home, in my bed, I cried over the near loss of my sweet, innocent Sheepie. She received the shots at 2:30 p.m. and we walked out of the clinic at 7 p.m.

I cannot begin to express how guilty I have felt for not first investigating results other dogs had to ProHeart. The vet and her intern both professed it's safety as I questioned them before the injections were given. They began the inoculations by giving her an oral wormer, part of the ProHeart package. I had not been told about that part. As they poured it down her throat, I argued that there was no diagnostic reason for it. They said it could not hurt her. She immediately threw it up. My pup had had a fecal exam a short time ago and it was negative. I felt stupid for going along with it. I have subsequently learned that my usual vet does not believe in the safety of ProHeart or use it. The FDA's ruling appears to validate my vet's understanding of the situation. The day cost me nearly four times what it would have cost at my vet's office. The future cost to my babies health and psyche are still unknown. The following day I took her to my usual vet for a full exam to determine any damage not visually detectable. None was found at that time. My vet told me problems, though rare can show up a long time after the fact. I force myself to be optimistic about the future.

I am happy to hear of the FDA's action against ProHeart. This product was obviously not tested thoroughly enough since so many problems have been reported. The clinic vet concluded my pup probably had an allergic reaction to the Lepto. My regular vet and I thought otherwise but did not report the incident. I did not even think of it. I am angry at Fort Dodge for covertly taking advantage of my pup. I am angry at the clinic vet for not explaining all the risks associated with ProHeart. I am angry at myself for simple stupidity. I have learned to: no longer take the word of any vet as gospel, not cut corners where the health of my baby is concerned and to investigate everything that goes into, on, or around my puppy.

Dogmania Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2003 4:14 pm

I took my Great Dane to the vet last weekend for a checkup and to get vaccinations. The dog was 7 years old and in EXCELLENT health. The vet even commented that he was in better shape than dogs half his age.

He received a CV Booster, a Bordetella booster and a ProHeart injection. That was on Saturday.

He was taken to be boarded on Sunday as we were going out of town. The kennel has been keeping him since he was a pup. He was fine on Sunday, but on Monday he was lethargic and had diarea and vomitting. He was given diarea medicine from the kennel.

He was worse on Tuesday morning and they took the dog to the vet that did the vaccinations. They put him on IV for fluids and by the end of Tuesday they said that he was doing better and called the kennel to come too get the dog. The kennel was not comfortable picking up the dog that soon as he still had a line in for fluids. He was kept overnight at the vet.

When the vet arrived the next morning, he was DEAD! Looking at the threads in this forum, it appears to be a symptom of the heartworm shots.

When the vet did a necropsy, they said he had massive infection and some blood in the abdomin. This is stange since the temp was taken at the vet on Sat, at the kennel on Monday and several times at the vet on Tuesday and he was never running a temp.

I don't know how a perfectly healthy dog that has never missed a heartwork treatment and never had any medical problems could die within 3 days of a full examination.

Anyone with information on what we can do to keep this from happening to any other beloved pets, please comment.

It is obvious the vets are not going to tell us anything that would interupt their revenue stream.

A comment about the kennel. It is extreamly clean and love their guests as much as the owners. They were devistated and as far as I am concerned did the right thing for our dog when he needed it.

Regards,

JT

Dogmania Posted: Fri Jan 30, 2004 7:44 pm

I'm new to this site, please be gentle, I'm on the edge.

I have found some good information thru links, and several letters from people who have lost their precious dogs shortly after receiving a ProHeart 6 injection at this site: www.Proheartinformation.com

On May 23, 2003 one of our honeys, Newport, had to be put to sleep. Newp was only 8 yrs old, a playful English Springer Spaniel, who became sick one month after his 2nd ProHeart 6 injection, diagnosed with cancer. 2 days ago was the first time I'd heard anything about the problems with ProHeart 6, needless to say we're still in shock.

We have two other ESS who have had the ProHeart 6 injections, and we are in a panic. We understand that there is no way to flush this junk from their systems, all that we can do is learn as much as possible.
If anyone finds any information, please pass it on to us.

Subject: My experience with Pro-Heart injection ...
Date: March 4, 2004 at 5:35 am PST: About two years ago, my vet recommended I try the Pro-Heart injection on Maddie (we'd had a scare because I had mixed up on whether or not I had given her her heartworm pill one month, so I brought her in to get tested.) Anyway, he assured me it was "100 percent safe and a lot more convenient."
So, I had him give it to Maddie. The next day she started stopping and sitting down every ten feet or so on our walks. (And this is a very bouncy dog who loooves to run). At first I thought she had a burr or an injured paw, but no. This continued the next day too and I took her back to the vet, who couldn't find anything wrong with her. (He did another full exam for free even though he had just done her full annual exam.) I asked if it could be the Pro-Heart injection, since that was the only variable that had changed in her life recently, and the vet said absolutely not, no way, couldn't be the Pro-Heart. He suggested that it might be something psychological - like she was being stubborn or something.
It took Maddie months to get to the point where she'd do a whole walk without stopping and sitting down and I've always been convinced it was that Pro-Heart (and this was before I started hearing the negative reports.) Based on that experience I've never given her another Pro-Heart nor our other dog. Don't trust it.
And I wish vets wouldn't be so cavalier about assuring you something's safe...
BG
I am not sure if anyone still reads this page, however I will post objections that I strongly feel about ProHeart here.

ProHeart6 and ProHeart12, in theory, are fabulous products. If the results were as clearcut as the products' manunfacturer intended (Fort Dodge), then I would be the first one taking my canine to work to be injected. However, this voluntary recall taken by Fort Dodge has led me to believe that, once again, that big business rules over the health of animals. I had a debate with someone who was in undergraduate program studying biology proceeding to veterinary medicine about ProHeart, this was before the recall. She seemed to have kept with reports of ProHeart. As I debated, her biggest selling point was that a Fort Dodge associate had come to Rutgers University (here in New Jersey) and proceeded to tell the students it was safe. If you are making a huge salary from pharmaceuticals..of course you will say the product is safe.

Now proceeding on to the negative aspects of ProHeart6:

For one thing, if your dog does an allergic reaction to the medication- think about it: you have just provided your dog with six months worth of heartworm prevention.

It is time released over a period of six months. I know with heartworm prevention you could give your animals in excess of over 90 times its weight in pills and it is fine, so I am not sure exactly what to do if your dog is allergic and has an anaphalatic reaction. Consult your veterinarian immediately.

Secondly, it is called practicing medicine for a reason. Longitudial studies are valuable - too bad the length of such studies do not go on for decades. In the meanwhile, I do understand it is important to release medication asap to help animals, in fact, I agree. However, when many cases are beginning to be reported and it turns from tens to hundreds, would it not be beneficial to address the newest statistics? Of course not - Ft. Dodge is a business. A voluntary recall means "1000 users of this medication have now been seriously affected" (aka fatal). Why so high?

CONSIDER THE IDEA YOU CAN GET HEARTWORM FROM PROHEART:

Example: "Max", your newly adopted dog has never been tested or put on prevention. The odds of hw being positive are higher in moist climates, hot weather, and polluted parts of the country.
Max (without your conscience knowledge) was bitten July 14, 2005 by an infected mosquito. It takes 6 months for a positive heartworm to show on a test, but may catch "baby" heartworms. You test Max on November 14, 2005 (4 months later). You get the results - lets say same day - as most veterinarians follow this procedure. You inject ProHeart into Max the same day (November 14th). Now, ProHeart6 is PREVENTION. In other words, anything that bites Max after November 14th will surely be covered, but not prior to. So, mid-January Max has heartworm. You don't know about it until (if your lucky) you get concerned about a 'cough' or he dies.

Oops, I guess Fort Dodge did not mention that. I understand there are ups and downs to everything. Especially for Shelties and Collies who have liver problems, because of an ingredient in heartworm pills- I believe it to be Ivermectin.

So to that extent, yes it does have its benefits.

My dog is on Interceptor : Prevention of Heartworm ALSO roundworm, hookworm, and whipworm.

These once-a-month doses will benefit in that they will kill off any growing heartworms. Poor Max, poor owner -neither knew. Who would have thought?

The pills cost about the same at my place of employment
Actually, I've heard vets say, even some that perform ProHeart6, that they would not give PH6 to any animal unless they are perfectly healthy, have been tested, not elder, have no past history of seizures.

So until your dog dies of ProHeart, will you recommend ProHeart? The choice is yours - but explain the truth of its working process. Then let the owner decide.